The second in the series of articles about Managing Creativity in the recent issue of Market Leader is a wonderfully eloquent diatribe against the increasing commoditisation of creativity written by Gordon Torr, ex-chair of the worldwide creative council of JWT and now a consultant and trainer.
In it, Gordon argues that agencies are now increasingly managed for efficiency, valuing productivity over craft, to the detriment of the quality of the ideas produced. He points out that all historic attempts to increase productivity based on scientific management theories, starting with Taylorism and continuing right up to the present day, have all resulted in the deskilling of the workforce.
Scientific management sought to break all tasks into their individual components, separating those tasks that could be 'routinised' from those that required an element of human judgement. The routine tasks could be reallocated to cheaper, unskilled workers, while the discretionary aspects of the task could be moved upwards to management, affording them more control over the outcomes.
Deskilling is a deliberate an systematic removal of the 'craft' from the 'craftsman'. It's the divorce of the mental from the manual, the apartheid of conception and execution.
In creative industries, however, Gordon notes that "creative tasks are, always and by definition, entirely discretionary. Their outcomes are indeterminate and they are naturally antipathetic to any kind of control". He continues, "according to the traditional deskilling model, thinkers should be sent upstairs and the doers should remain on the factory floor. But in the creative industries the thinkers are the doers. This is the paradox of managing creativity, the very nub of the peculiar conflict between managing for efficiency and managing for ideas."
In other words I think Gordon is arguing that conception should not be divided from execution, and without explicitly saying it, I believe he is arguing that that planning and creative should not be divorced from each other.
Which leads me to ask, is planning really deskilling creative? In our attempts to be more efficient throughthe division of labour into specialisms have we turned our creatives into idea monkeys and by removing them from the more discretionary decision-making about strategy? Is creative generalism the answer or will there always be a role for specialists?