All change
A truly great piece of communication. I can see how this could work really well in a pitch situation.
Via Toad
A truly great piece of communication. I can see how this could work really well in a pitch situation.
Via Toad
Juan 'the man' Cabral serves up 'Mad Max' via Pixar's 'Cars' in an attempt to give us a glass and a half of joy for Cadbury's.
Whilst 'Trucks' would no doubt score pretty high on engagement when compared to most ads, it seems to lack the drama and downright audacity of 'Gorilla' or the glorious multi-sensory indulgence that was 'Balls'.
I'm not sure that 'Trucks' quite cuts it as a piece of pure spellbinding entertainment in the way that 'Gorilla' and 'Balls' do.
And I'm a gearhead with a life-long interest in aviation (sad, I know).
'Gorilla' and 'Balls' both went spectacularly viral because they were truly incredible pieces of entertainment.
'Trucks' is merely quite interesting.
The question is, will that be enough for Cadbury's given that the strategy that Fallon are using appears to lean heavilly on driving salience at the cost of creating an enduring link back to the brand.
In Hey Whipple, Luke Sullivan cautions that to be effective "your interesting device cannot just point to the sales message, it must be the sales message."
Sullivan goes on to quote a similar piece of advice from Bill Bernbach ("Stay with the product") before continuing to recommend that creatives should avoid getting "tangled up in unrelated ideas, however fanciful. There is no such thing as borrowed interest. Interest lasts as long as something is interesting. Interesting words make for a delightful sentence but not a persuasive one."
I'm sure others would no doubt disagree.
It's early 2008 and in a trendy office somewhere in the vicinity of Bloomsbury a young 'creative' turns to his colleague and says: "I've got a great idea for Pot Noodle. Why don't we make an ad with a chain reaction in it? You know, sort of like those contraptions in the old Rube Goldberg cartoons. No one's ever done that before. And we could make it really of the moment by casting some chavs."
Battology: needless and tiresome repetition (esp. in writing)
Chav was the Oxford English Dictionary "word of the year" back in 2004.
YouTube: "Today [March 26th] we're releasing YouTube Insight, a free tool that enables anyone with a YouTube account to view detailed statistics about the videos that they upload to the site. For example, uploaders can see how often their videos are viewed in different geographic regions, as well as how popular they are relative to all videos in that market over a given period of time. You can also delve deeper into the lifecycle of your videos, like how long it takes for a video to become popular, and what happens to video views as popularity peaks."
If only you could do the same (or get limited access) for videos that others upload too.
An acronym you may not have come across which was used recently in a presentation by Jonathan Rosenberg, SVP product management and marketing at Google ...
Avoid HiPPOs: A hippo kills more people than any other animal. In business, hippos kill more products & ideas than anyone, A hippo is the highest paid person’s opinion. Hippos say “I think…”
Another slideshare treat. This is a trends presentation given by Aki Spicer to his colleagues at Fallon in Minneapolis over lunch the other day (which they incidentally broadcast live by video across the internet using Yahoo! Live).
His focus is on 10 trends in social media and how to take advantage of them. Here's the takeaway for those in a hurry:
Meanwhile over on Millward Brown's blog, the ever provocative Charles Frith
has challenged the normally unflappable Nigel Hollis to use MB's
proprietary pre-testing system to test and improve upon Cadbury's
"Gorilla" and make the results public!
So far Nigel has chosen to stonewall a bit by saying that it had already been successfully LINK tested but that he could not confirm or deny the results it got or whether it was changed as a result of the test. Intriguing. Perhaps someone (Mike?) could have a quiet word with Phil Rumbold and ask him to release the learnings to the industry for the greater good.
Charles suggested testing an ad that has not been tested before. Nigel's comments on an earlier post suggested that he would be up for the challenge. Any suggestions?
Jason Oke has started an important discussion about the shortcomings of our current use of research in marketing over on his blog.He kicked off the discussion with this deck.
In the comments Jason argues: "The tweaks required to make research more valuable are often minor ones, but ones that are counter-intuitive to people stuck in the old frameworks. They require asking people questions that are less literal, less direct, and sometimes require asking people fewer questions altogether. They also require allowing respondents to have more fun and flow with their answers, giving up some control and direction in the research. These things can seem scary to people who don’t understand the reasons and benefits for doing so. It’s a lot easier, and easier to explain to your boss, to just ask people directly “which proposition statement do you like best.” Unfortunately it’s also completely the wrong thing to do."
Clearly adding moustaches to ads isn't subversive enough for some people. The East London Decapitator has taken to protesting against urban spam by ripping the heads off ad people and leaving nothing but bleeding stumps where their heads once were. ELD on Flickr. ELD on YouTube.
Remember to set the PVR for another potential treat this weekend: there is a documentary on BBC Four on Saturday night about the life and work of David Ogilvy:
"David Ogilvy's advertising agency started out in 1948 with no clients and two members of staff, and became the largest advertising conglomerate in the world. This documentary reveals Ogilvy's extremes and eccentricities through interviews with individuals whose lives he touched: those who knew him and worked with him during the conception of some of his most famous campaigns."
I hope it's better than the recycled pap that is 'Hard Sell'.
Gordon Torr: Managing Creative People: Lessons for Leadership in the Ideas Economy
I hope Gordon didn't choose that subtitle. It seems below him somehow. Grubby even. His book is, he insists, the first attempt to fully explore how to get the best out of creative people. I'm currently half way through and loving every bit of it. More soon. (****)
Randall Rothenberg: Where the Suckers Moon: The Life and Death of an Advertising Campaign
Rothenberg is a long time NYT journalist who went on to be editor of Ad Age and is now president and CEO of the Interactive Advertising Bureau. Where the Suckers Moon is an implausibly detailed account of the pitch and subsequent development of an ad campaign for Subaru USA. The book ends with Wieden's Subaru ads being voted dead last by consumers on Superbowl Sunday in 1993. It's quite a ride. (*****)
Joshua Ferris: Then We Came to the End
The rythyms of life in a Chicago ad agency during a recession. The writing is a bit too staccato for my liking and the characters are all long gone before you can get to know them. Nonetheless, it is about as close to home as you can get. (***)
Joe Moran: Queuing for Beginners: The Story of Daily Life from Breakfast to Bedtime
More homespun ethnography in the vein of Kate Fox's 'Watching the English'. Makes you think and there is even some gold hidden between the platitides. (****)
Nick Davies: Flat Earth News: An Award-winning Reporter Exposes Falsehood, Distortion and Propaganda in the Global Media
Davies finds his colleagues in the media guilty of systematically recycling press releases and news agency output without checking the facts or seeking to find the truth. Shame he doesn't even attempt to seek a solution. (****)
Sam Delaney: Get Smashed!: The Story of the Men Who Made the Adverts That Changed Our Lives
Enjoyable romp through the history of (mostly British) advertising containing some (possibly apocryphal) tales from those that lived through it. (*****)
Mark Tungate: Adland: A Global History of Advertising
Tungate manages to make the history of advertising boring. Quite an achievement. (**)
Robert Johansen: Get There Early
The Institute for the Future's president Bob Johansen gives us the benefit of his 30 years as a trends forecaster and futurist. (***)
Joe Moran: Queuing for Beginners: The Story of Daily Life from Breakfast to Bedtime
Watching the English revisited. Joe Moran digs into the Mass Observation archive (and a lot more besides) to tell the story of how everyday British habits have changed over the last century. (****)
Oona Strathern: A Brief History of the Future; How Visionary Thinkers Changed the World and Tomorrow's Trends Are 'Made' and Marketed
A worthy attempt at pulling together the history of futurists and trendspotters. Nice companion to 'Where's my Jetpack?' (****)
Jim Taylor & Steve Hatch: Rigorous Magic: Communication Ideas and Their Application
A valiant but ultimately flawed attempt to codify and assess the value of different types of communications ideas. The typology they have created is useful but they fall down when it comes to providing workable definitions (e.g. between an 'emotional platform' and a 'brand idea'). Furthermore, being media men they are predictably in thrall of those kinds of ideas that media agencies can control ('activation' and 'symbiotic' ideas), less enthusiastic about 'brand' ideas and brazenly critical of the value of 'advertising' ideas. (**)
Stuart Maconie: Pies and Prejudice: In Search of the North
Imagine if Pevsner was written by Nick Hornby. Maconie fights his demons about living in the South of England by going back home to the North. Supposendly a travel book, this is Maconie's humorous and informative take on the North-South divide. (***)
Mark Earls: Herd: How to Change Mass Behaviour by Harnessing Our True Nature
Mark Earls, the professional contrarian and erstwhile Head of Planning at Ogilvy London has developed his ideas about herd thinking into a book for all to see. (****)
Dick Taverne: The March of Unreason: Science, Democracy, and the New Fundamentalism
If you like Ben Goldacre's Bad Science column in The Guardian then you will enjoy this. I don't agree with all of it but then that's part of the point. (***)
Andrew Marr: My Trade: A Short History of British Journalism
Andrew Marr writes his autobiography under the guise of authoring an insider perspective on the world of news journalism. Fascinating and written with a light touch. Not as ambitious as it might have been but riveting nonetheless. (****)