Nissan Qashqai Skateboard ad
Loving this Nissan car-as-skateboard ad ...
[Embedded YouTube Video]
Though Carscoop points out that the idea of 4x4 as urban skateboard has a legacy...
[Embedded YouTube Video]
« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »
Loving this Nissan car-as-skateboard ad ...
[Embedded YouTube Video]
Though Carscoop points out that the idea of 4x4 as urban skateboard has a legacy...
[Embedded YouTube Video]
Martin Moore reports from a PR Week sponsored debate at the University of Westminster this week where some big names in the PR industry debated whether or not ‘PR has a duty to tell the truth’.
The result: 53% of the 260 members of the audience voted against the motion.
Should we be surprised? Whilst aspiring to be truthful it seems that the PR profession recognised that telling the truth was not compatible with their duty to their clients!
Max Clifford was arguing against the motion. In a low-key, frank and absorbingly anecdotal performance he told the audience how his first duty was always to his client and that he had been 'telling lies on behalf of my clients for 40 years'. He chose to lie in certain instances because the 'price of telling that truth would be terribly destructive to lots of people'.
More interesting were the justifications given by the panel for not telling the truth. Chief among these (dwarfing the rest) was the culpability of the news media. Journalists were to blame, they said, because journalists constantly sought out tension, discord and disruption. PR executives had to protect their clients from them and, when necessary, fib / be economical with the truth / lie. If this is the view across the industry it does not bode well for a constructive dialogue between PR and the media.
These news media consumption numbers from KPMG surprised me - I expected more people in the UK to have switched to the web as a primary means of news by now ...
Plus it's quite surprising (to me at least) that the UK lags Spain in terms of web news media consumption ...
Via: Press Gazette
The Office for National Statistics reported today that in 2005 there were only 283,730 weddings in the UK, down nearly 10 per cent from 313,550 weddings in the previous year.
The ONS attribute this sharp fall to the introduction of legislation to ban 'sham weddings' as part of the Asylum and Immigration Act which was introduced in Feb 2005.
Stephen Pound MP described the nature of the issue in a statement to parliament in May 2004.
Seems that the bandwagon logo that I posted about yesterday is not intended to look like a phallus after all.
Terence posted in a comment on the bandwagon blog that they just "transposed the “b” in bandwagon and stuck a bar on top of it. It’s actually supposed to be: a headphone, a “high” note (emphasis on high), a bandwagon, or bart simpson with funny ears."
They're now asking whether or not they should change it ...
And have made this offer (not sure if it is transferable): "If you create the new Bandwagon logo (before Thursday), we will give you 2 free accounts, credit inside the application and a link to your work/blog/portfolio on our ridethebandwagon.com pages." Any takers?
"Romanticism was ... an artistic and intellectual movement ... a revolt against ... the norms of the Enlightenment period and a reaction against the rationalization of nature ... it stressed strong emotion as a source of aesthetic experience, placing new emphasis on such emotions as trepidation, horror, and the awe experienced in confronting the sublimity of nature."
I'm tempted to argue that romanticism has become the dominant intellectual movement in planning these days. It's increasingly hard to find anyone who works in planning these days who is willing to espouse a slightly more rational, positivist, objectivist view of how advertising might work. Whilst a healthy scepticism of so-called 'marketing scientists' is one thing, the upcoming generation of planners in particular seem to have absolutely no interest in what the past can teach us about the future and seem happy to ignore any inconvenient truths that may arise from research.
Reading many of the planning blogs out there I'm often reminded of Stephen Colbert's satirical address to George Bush at the White House correspondents' dinner last year ...
"We're not brainiacs on the nerd patrol. We're not members of the factinista. We go straight from the gut, right sir? That's where the truth lies, right down here in the gut. Do you know you have more nerve endings in your gut than you have in your head? You can look it up. I know some of you are going to say "I did look it up, and that's not true." That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut. I did. My gut tells me that's how our nervous system works."
Maybe I got out of the wrong side of bed this morning ;-)
I'm jumping on the bandwagon. This useful-sounding service will apparently back up all your iTunes online. Nice.
To generate buzz they came up with the idea of giving those bloggers that link to them and post their logo a free subscription when the service starts up in a few days.
As the New York Times recently reported, incentives really do make a difference when it comes to creating word of mouth.
And is it just me or is that one hell of a phallic logo? Perhaps this will end up being just a scam designed to make us all look stupid?
Via Russell Davies.
John Grant treats us to his "hazy recollections" of the history of planning over on Brand Tarot this morning. I particularly love his description of the introduction of Millward Brown's LINK ad pre-testing system in the 90s ...
"Meanwhile, ever sensitive to the current debates in advertising, Millward Brown launch the Awareness Index, the most reductive answer to any complex question since the "42" of HHG2G"
Entertainingly YouTube has this footage of the Millward Brown Xmas party. Could the heart of England's biggest research agency be trying to prove that they can party?
Gordon Torr: Managing Creative People: Lessons for Leadership in the Ideas Economy
I hope Gordon didn't choose that subtitle. It seems below him somehow. Grubby even. His book is, he insists, the first attempt to fully explore how to get the best out of creative people. I'm currently half way through and loving every bit of it. More soon. (****)
Randall Rothenberg: Where the Suckers Moon: The Life and Death of an Advertising Campaign
Rothenberg is a long time NYT journalist who went on to be editor of Ad Age and is now president and CEO of the Interactive Advertising Bureau. Where the Suckers Moon is an implausibly detailed account of the pitch and subsequent development of an ad campaign for Subaru USA. The book ends with Wieden's Subaru ads being voted dead last by consumers on Superbowl Sunday in 1993. It's quite a ride. (*****)
Joshua Ferris: Then We Came to the End
The rythyms of life in a Chicago ad agency during a recession. The writing is a bit too staccato for my liking and the characters are all long gone before you can get to know them. Nonetheless, it is about as close to home as you can get. (***)
Joe Moran: Queuing for Beginners: The Story of Daily Life from Breakfast to Bedtime
More homespun ethnography in the vein of Kate Fox's 'Watching the English'. Makes you think and there is even some gold hidden between the platitides. (****)
Nick Davies: Flat Earth News: An Award-winning Reporter Exposes Falsehood, Distortion and Propaganda in the Global Media
Davies finds his colleagues in the media guilty of systematically recycling press releases and news agency output without checking the facts or seeking to find the truth. Shame he doesn't even attempt to seek a solution. (****)
Sam Delaney: Get Smashed!: The Story of the Men Who Made the Adverts That Changed Our Lives
Enjoyable romp through the history of (mostly British) advertising containing some (possibly apocryphal) tales from those that lived through it. (*****)
Mark Tungate: Adland: A Global History of Advertising
Tungate manages to make the history of advertising boring. Quite an achievement. (**)
Robert Johansen: Get There Early
The Institute for the Future's president Bob Johansen gives us the benefit of his 30 years as a trends forecaster and futurist. (***)
Joe Moran: Queuing for Beginners: The Story of Daily Life from Breakfast to Bedtime
Watching the English revisited. Joe Moran digs into the Mass Observation archive (and a lot more besides) to tell the story of how everyday British habits have changed over the last century. (****)
Oona Strathern: A Brief History of the Future; How Visionary Thinkers Changed the World and Tomorrow's Trends Are 'Made' and Marketed
A worthy attempt at pulling together the history of futurists and trendspotters. Nice companion to 'Where's my Jetpack?' (****)
Jim Taylor & Steve Hatch: Rigorous Magic: Communication Ideas and Their Application
A valiant but ultimately flawed attempt to codify and assess the value of different types of communications ideas. The typology they have created is useful but they fall down when it comes to providing workable definitions (e.g. between an 'emotional platform' and a 'brand idea'). Furthermore, being media men they are predictably in thrall of those kinds of ideas that media agencies can control ('activation' and 'symbiotic' ideas), less enthusiastic about 'brand' ideas and brazenly critical of the value of 'advertising' ideas. (**)
Stuart Maconie: Pies and Prejudice: In Search of the North
Imagine if Pevsner was written by Nick Hornby. Maconie fights his demons about living in the South of England by going back home to the North. Supposendly a travel book, this is Maconie's humorous and informative take on the North-South divide. (***)
Mark Earls: Herd: How to Change Mass Behaviour by Harnessing Our True Nature
Mark Earls, the professional contrarian and erstwhile Head of Planning at Ogilvy London has developed his ideas about herd thinking into a book for all to see. (****)
Dick Taverne: The March of Unreason: Science, Democracy, and the New Fundamentalism
If you like Ben Goldacre's Bad Science column in The Guardian then you will enjoy this. I don't agree with all of it but then that's part of the point. (***)
Andrew Marr: My Trade: A Short History of British Journalism
Andrew Marr writes his autobiography under the guise of authoring an insider perspective on the world of news journalism. Fascinating and written with a light touch. Not as ambitious as it might have been but riveting nonetheless. (****)