Ethnography is, as we all know by now, the new focus group. With the sponsorship of P&G's A.G. Lafley and much trumpeting from Bruce Nussbaum and the Innovation & Design team over at Business Week, many of my clients around the world are now beginning to view ethnography as some sort of insight panacea.
Business Week, Ethnographic Hits, May 26th 2006
Business Week, The Science of Desire, May 30th 2006
Business Week, Ethnography Do It Right, June 5th 2006
Business Week, The Ethnography of Marketing, June 12th 2006
Business Week, Ethnography is the New Core Competence, June 19th 2006
Now I'm not knocking ethnography per se. As an approach to learning about consumers it has clear and obvious benefits over the 'traditional' focus group and depth interview. Where groups are often stilted and artificial, ethnography and participant observation can, of course, bring us closer to consumers in their natural habitat.
As the anthropologist Ken Erickson said in an article prepared for the British Association of Qualitative Research Practitioners (AQRP) in 2003, "ethnographic teams, with their business counterparts, can see how people come not to do what they say they do."
But I suppose my concern is that many people who are currently commissioning ethnographic research do not really understand what they are buying and many of those who claim to be doing ethnography are doing nothing of the sort.
And the villain of the piece is time. I think Rashmi Sinha cracks the issue in this post about the limitations that time puts on doing proper ethnography:
"I doubt that most people are even doing ethnography in the real sense of the word. Call it user/customer research, observation / qualitative interviews / design research. Sometimes when talking to clients, they ask us if we do "ethnography" - I always say, "well kind of", feeling guilty about calling the type of qualitative research that one has time for - ethnography."
And that's the crux. Under the pressures of time, focus groups became a commodity - something to be turned around in a few days from start to finish with a fixed price, some on-the-spot interpretation and a more-or-less instant debrief. As time pressures have increased, the quality has gone down and I fear ethnography will go exactly the same way.
It appears that a new breed of (largely untrained) ethnographers are already clammering to offer their clients something called rapid ethnography. But I have to agree with Ted McIlwraith when, in a comment under Rashmi's post, he states that rapid ethnography is surely "somewhat oxymoronic" because done well, ethnography takes time. You need time to build the trust of those you are engaging with and you need time to go through the observations you have made.
But as we know, time is money and therefore I fear that ethnography (as a marketing tool) will probably be condemned to a future of aggressive timescales and woefully shallow insights.